We’ve all seen it in the movies, and you’ve probably read about it in sci-fi novels. But the reality is that we are living in the future now. In the era of “smart” living, artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT), even our cities and communities are shifting to the use of various technological tools to make the places we call home safer and least to say, even smarter.
Through the efforts our cities put into collecting and analysing live data, AI can now help cities and municipalities with operational management processes. This includes street traffic, deployment of community services, resource allocation, utility load and distribution, and even with disaster mitigation and crisis management.
It is necessary to take into account the potential hazards and drawbacks of this technology in addition to how AI and IoT use in our cities may make our lives simpler and more effective. One issue is the potential for privacy violations, as these systems' collection and processing of personal information might be used to follow and monitor people without their knowledge or agreement.
The potential for technological mistakes or failures, which could have negative effects on community functioning and public safety, is another issue. Cities and municipalities must establish trustworthy methods for locating and fixing any issues with these systems, as well as to notify the public and actively involve them in developing and applying new technology.
What You Need to Know about “Smart” City Living
At its best, these smart tools we interact with on a daily basis can undoubtedly offer living environments that are attuned and particularly responsive to the needs of the general population. These also allow citizens to engage and coordinate with their governments and communities directly. However, the data required by such systems and tools come with a price that is even more invaluable than any material resource the government can access, as it is often human and more personal. This is based on the reasoning that in order for our cities to be “smart” enough to respond to us, they need to learn about us, usually through surveillance and monitoring of our homes, our communities, and the very streets we live in.
Even the most seemingly harmless projects can impose farther-reaching implications in our lives. One good example would be the “smart” meters. These are used primarily to track our energy consumption to provide citizens with a more efficient and accurate way of determining their energy usage and promote habits that could benefit the wider population and reduce environmental risks. In this example, however, if the tracking mechanism is detailed enough, these smart meters can become tools that can gather private and personal information such as whether or not someone is home, how many people are there, if they are currently awake or sleeping, and even which devices are being used at a certain time.
What are the Loopholes of Smart City Living (and Countermeasures to Correct Them)
One of the many challenges when it comes to the approval and adoption of smart city solutions is determining the basis of whether or not these solutions have been driven by a threat or an event, instead of a well-planned effort to resolve an existing (or even a projected) issue within the community.
The Inequality in Smart City Design
Citizen engagement is needed where the “costs” of living in a smart city is unreasonably shouldered by communities and citizens that are considered to be within the marginalized sectors of society. In places with unusually higher incidences of violence, people are not to be treated with lesser rights to privacy. Where people are more prone to violence, injustice, and unfair treatment of their rights, the citizens should all be engaged and actively seek to involve themselves in the decision-making process within and for their communities.
There is no doubt that smart cities have the potential and capacity to uplift the quality of safety and convenience deserved by citizens in every community. However, when the benefits come at the cost of our privacy as individuals and communities, it’s important that we be given a role to be considered part of the planning and implementation of such solutions within our very own community. This is how we should hold the government and service providers accountable for their management of our resources.
Highlighting the significance of openness and responsibility in creating and applying smart city solutions is one method to further expand the concepts in this text. The public needs to know how service providers and governmental organizations acquire, store, and use personal data. Clear rules and regulations must also be in place to guarantee that these organizations are held responsible for any wrongful or negligent data handling.
Recognizing that the advantages of smart city solutions should be disseminated equally throughout all communities, regardless of socioeconomic position or other demographic characteristics, is also crucial. This calls for a dedication to solving structural injustices and ensuring that underrepresented populations are not left behind in the creation of smart city infrastructure.
In conclusion, it is very important to understand both the advantages and disadvantages of "smart" city life as we continue to evolve into a more technological future. While AI and IoT technologies can be very helpful to our communities and make them safer and more effective, there are also possible risks to consider; these risks can be privacy violations and technological malfunctions. Governments and service providers must build reliable procedures for identifying and resolving problems with these systems and involve the public in their creation and use.
Also, citizens need to be responsible and proactively involved in creating smart city solutions; this will help with the balance of society. It is also a very important part to understand the potential inequality that will ensure the creation of smart cities, as well as working to ensure that all communities have access to the new technologies without considering social or financial; status. To secure a just and equitable future for all, transparency, responsibility, and a commitment to addressing structural inequities in the processing of personal data are required. We can ensure that the advantages of smart city life are dispersed evenly and responsibly by recognising these problems and working toward solutions.
Check more VPN Surf blogs here:
- Free VPN vs Paid VPN: Which One is Good for You?
Do you value your privacy online?
Use VPN Surf and surf safely and securely in the open waters of the internet.